Skip to main content

CISSP - Biba Model (Biba Integrity Model)


Origin: Published in 1977 at the Mitre Corporation, one year after the Bell La-Padula model. While BLP model addresses Confidentiality (and nothing about Integrity), Biba proposed this model to address Integrity





Biba Integrity model describes a set of access control rules that are designed to ensure data integrity. Subjects and Objects are grouped into various ordered levels of integrity.





Access modes of Biba Model





  • Modify: This allows a subject to write to an object. In layman parlance, it is equivalent to write mode in other models.
  • Observe: This allows a subject to read an object. This command is synonymous to the read command of other models.
  • Invoke: This allows one subject to communicate with another subject.
  • Execute: This allows a subject to execute an object. The command essentially allows a subject to execute a program which is the object




This model is directed towards data integrity (rather than confidentiality). It is also called "read up, write down" model. This implies users can only write content at or below their own integrity level. Similarly, users can only read content at or above their own integrity level.





Set of rules defined by Biba model:





The Simple Integrity Property states that a subject at a given level of integrity must not read data at a lower integrity level (no read down)





Mathematically, denoted as: s ∈ S can observe o∈ O if and only if i(s) ≤ i(o)









The * (star) Integrity Property states that a subject at a given level of integrity must not write data at a higher level of integrity (no write up).





Mathematically, denoted as: s ∈ S can modify to o∈ O if and only if i(o) ≤ i(s)









Invocation Property states that a process from below cannot request higher access; only with subjects at an equal or lower level.





Mathematically, denoted as: s₁ ∈ S can invoke s₂ ∈ S if and only if i(s₂ ) ≤ i(s₁ )






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Checkpoint - Exporting Objects in CSV format

Be it a Network Operations Manager, Security Architect or a Security Auditor, the people up the hierarchy always harangue the Security Engineers to compile the list of firewall objects or rules or policies or the traffic statistics and so on.. This can turn out to be quite hectic especially if there are no built in features to systematically provide the output in a "layman-readable" format. Come, Checkpoint's "Object Explorer..."  which not only provides the output in the "layman-readable" format, but also provides in-built filtering mechanisms, thereby ensuring that the Security Engineer doesn't have to rely on Google for building his scarce Microsoft Excel data filtering skills. The following screenshots will show how easy it is, with Checkpoint R80.10 to generate the firewall configuration inventory. On the SmartConsole Unified Portal, navigate to Menu >> Open Object Explorer... Select the Categories you wish to see in your output: Click o

MITRE ATT&CK - Kerberos Vulnerabilities and Security

From the previous post, the summary of Kerberos authentication process is as below: For the initial authentication, the user’s client machine sends a request to the KDC  Authentication Service (AS) . The request includes details like the user’s username, and the date and time. All information except the username is encrypted using the hash of the user’s password. The KDC AS uses the username to look up its copy of the user’s password hash and uses it to decrypt the rest of the request. If the decryption is successful, that means the client used the correct password hash and the user has successfully authenticated. Once the user is authenticated, the KDC AS sends the user’s client a  ticket granting ticket   (TGT) . The TGT includes a unique session key and a timestamp that specifies how long that session is valid (normally 8 or 10 hours). Importantly, before sending the TGT, the KDC encrypts it using the password hash for a special account, the  KRBTGT account.  That password hash is s

Tejas Jain - GCP Constraints & Random Facts

1.  Google Cloud Interconnect Security Cloud Interconnect does not encrypt the connection between your on-premises network and Google's network. Cloud VPN cannot be used with Dedicated Interconnect For additional security, use application-level encryption or your own VPN 2. While using Cloud CDN, the default time-to-live (TTL) for content caching is 3600 seconds = 60 mins 3. Cloud NAT sends only the translation logs and error logs to Cloud Logging service. 4. GCP Dedicated Interconnect - On Premises network device requirements:     10-Gbps circuits, single mode fiber or 100-Gbps circuits, single mode fiber     IPv4 link local addressing     LACP, even if you are using single circuit     EBGP-4 with multi-hop     802.1Q VLANs 5. While using Cloud VPN, the recommended MTU to be configured on the peer VPN  gateway = 1460 bytes 6. Each instance must have at least one network interface. The maximum number of network instances per instance is 8, depending on the instance's machine